================================================================ 1993 POST ELECTION ENGLISH QUESTIONNAIRE

================================================================

>pesver< [allow 2][loc 0/82][store <v8> in pesver]

>pesgend< [return][open cb][loc 9/2][allow 1]

[setkey <f3> to <skcb>]

[r] INTERVIEWER: Enter respondent's gender please [n]

<1> Male

<5> Female

<8> Don't know

====>

>pesssss< [if pestim1 is <>][settime pestim1][endif]

SECTION A: THE VOTE

>pesa1< [allow 2]

In the campaign, what was the most important issue to YOU

PERSONALLY?

<1> Enter respondent's answer verbatim please [specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

====>

>pesa2<

Did YOU vote in the election?

<1> Yes [goto pesa4]

<5> No [goto pesa5a]

<8> Don't know [goto pesa5a] <9> Refused [goto pesa6]

====>

>pesa4<

[store <Reform Party> in rc3]

[if pesprov eq <4>][store <Bloc Québécois> in rc3][endif]

Which party did you vote for: the Conservative Party, the

Liberal Party, the New Democratic Party, the [fill rc3], or

another party?

<1> Conservative [goto pesa4a]

<2> Liberal [goto pesa4a]

<3> N.D.P [goto pesa4a]

<4> Reform Party [goto pesa4a]

<5> Bloc Québécois [goto pesa4a]

<0> Other (specify) [specify] [goto pesa4a]

<97> None [goto pesa6]

<98> Don't Know [goto pesa6] <99> Refused [goto pesa6]

====>

>pesa4a<

[if pesa4 eq <1>][store <the Conservative Party> in rc3][endif]

[if pesa4 eq <2>][store <the Liberal Party> in rc3][endif]

[if pesa4 eq <3>][store <the N.D.P.> in rc3][endif]

[if pesa4 eq <4>][store <the Reform Party> in rc3][endif]

[if pesa4 eq <5>][store <the Bloc Québécois> in rc3][endif]

[if pesa4 eq <0>][store <that party> in rc3][endif]

Would you say that your preference for [fill rc3] was VERY

STRONG, SOMEWHAT STRONG or NOT VERY STRONG?

<1> Very strong

<3> Somewhat strong

<5> Not very strong

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesa4b<

When did you decide that you were going to vote for [fill rc3]?

Was it before the campaign began, before the debate, during or just after the debate, in the last two weeks of the campaign, or election day?

<1> before the campaign began,

<2> before the debate,

<3> during or just after the debate,

<4> in the last two weeks of the campaign

<5> election day?

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

=====> [goto pesa6]

>pesa5a<

[store <Reform Party> in rc3]

[if pesprov eq <4>][store <Bloc Québécois> in rc3][endif]

If you HAD voted, which party would you have voted for: the

Conservative Party, the Liberal Party, the New Democratic

Party, the [fill rc3], or another party?

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify] (specify)

<7> No party worth voting for

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

=====>

>pesa6<

Thinking back to Election Day, which party did you think

would win in YOUR RIDING?

[r] INTERVIEWER: IF NEEDED "What was your best guess" [n]

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify] (specify)

<98> Don't Know/Don't Remember [goto pesa8]

<99> Refused [goto pesa8]

=====>

>pesa7<

Which party did you think would finish second in YOUR RIDING?

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify] (specify)

<98> Don't Know/Don't Remember <99> Refused

=====>

>pesa8<

How close did you think the election would be in your riding:

VERY CLOSE, FAIRLY CLOSE, NOT VERY CLOSE, or NOT CLOSE

AT ALL?

<1> Very Close

<3> Fairly Close

<5> Not Very Close

<7> Not Close at All

<8> Don't Know/Don't Remember <9> Refused

=====>

>pesa9< [# pesa9-pesa12 added per blais/gidengal 26 Oct.]

And on Election day, which party did you think would win the most seats in

THE WHOLE COUNTRY?

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify] (specify)

<98> Don't Know/Don't Remember <99> Refused

=====>

>pesa10<

Which party did you think would have the second highest number of seats

in THE WHOLE COUNTRY?

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify] (specify)

<98> Don't Know/Don't Remember <99> Refused

=====>

>pesa11<

Do you think it is better to have a MAJORITY government, a MINORITY

government or does it make no difference?

<1> Majority

<5> Minority

<7> No difference

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesa12<

Do you think the Bloc Québécois should be allowed to form the official

opposition?

<1> Yes

<5> No

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

SECTION B: INTEREST AND MEDIA

>pesb1<

Would you say that you were VERY interested, FAIRLY interested,

NOT very interested, or NOT AT ALL interested in the past federal

election campaign?

<1> Very interested

<3> Fairly interested

<5> Not very interested

<7> Not at all interested

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesb2<

How much attention did you pay to the news on TV about the

federal election campaign?

Would you say, A GREAT DEAL, QUITE A BIT, SOME, VERY LITTLE,

or NONE?

<1> A great deal

<2> Quite a bit

<3> Some

<4> Very little

<5> None/does not watch TV news

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesb3<

How much attention did you pay to articles in the NEWSPAPERS

about the election campaign? Would you say, A GREAT DEAL,

QUITE A BIT, SOME, VERY LITTLE, or NONE?

<1> A great deal

<2> Quite a bit

<3> Some

<4> Very little

<5> None/does not read newspapers

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesb4<

How much attention did you pay to the news on the RADIO about the

election campaign? Would you say, A GREAT DEAL, QUITE A BIT,

SOME, VERY LITTLE, or NONE?

<1> A great deal

<2> Quite a bit

<3> Some

<4> Very little

<5> None/does not listen to the radio

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesb5<

Did you see the FRENCH TV debate among the party leaders?

<1> Yes

<5> No

<8> Don't know

<9> Refused [goto pesb6]

====>

>pesb5a< [store <W> in rc3]

[if pesb5 eq <1>][store <In your opinion, w>in rc3][endif]

[if pesb5 eq <5>][store <From what you have heard, w>in rc3][endif]

[if pesb5 eq <8>][store <From what you have heard, w>in rc3][endif]

[fill rc3]hich leader performed the BEST in that debate?

[r] INTERVIEWER: Reading counts as hearing [n]

<0> none

<1> Campbell/Conservative

<3> Chretien/Liberal

<5> McLaughlin/NDP

<7> Bouchard/Bloc

<9> Manning/Reform

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

====>

>pesb5b<

And which leader performed the WORST?

<0> none

<1> Campbell/Conservative

<3> Chretien/Liberal

<5> McLaughlin/NDP

<7> Bouchard/Bloc

<9> Manning/Reform

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

====>

>pesb6<

Did you see the ENGLISH TV debate among the party leaders?

<1> Yes

<5> No

<8> Don't know

<9> Refused [goto pesc1]

====>

>pesb6a<

[store <W> in rc3]

[if pesb6 eq <1>][store <In your opinion, w> in rc3][endif]

[if pesb6 eq <5>][store <From what you have heard, w> in rc3][endif]

[if pesb6 eq <8>][store <From what you have heard, w> in rc3][endif]

[fill rc3]hich leader performed the BEST in that debate?

[r] INTERVIEWER: Reading counts as hearing [n]

<0> none

<1> Campbell/Conservative

<3> Chretien/Liberal

<5> McLaughlin/NDP

<7> Bouchard/Bloc

<9> Manning/Reform

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

====>

>pesb6b<

And which leader performed the WORST?

<0> none

<1> Campbell/Conservative

<3> Chretien/Liberal

<5> McLaughlin/NDP

<7> Bouchard/Bloc

<9> Manning/Reform

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

====>

SECTION C: CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT

>pesc1<

DURING THE FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN, did you discuss

politics with other people?

<1> Yes

<5> No

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesc2<

DURING THE CAMPAIGN did you help a party, for example, by going to

a meeting or rally, by working for a candidate, by putting a sticker

on your car, or by putting up a lawn sign?

<1> Yes

<5> No [goto pesc3]

<8> Don't know [goto pesc3] <9> Refused [goto pesc3]

=====>

>pesc2a<

Which party or parties was that?

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other (specify)[specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

=====>

>pesc2b<

Any other party?

<0> NO OTHER MENTIONS

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

=====>

>pesc3<

DURING THE CAMPAIGN, were you contacted in person or by telephone

by any of the local candidates or party workers in your riding?

<1> yes in person or telephone

<5> no [goto pesc5]

<7> IF VOLUNTEERED information dropped at door

<8> Don't know [goto pesc5] <9> Refused [goto pesc5]

====>

>pesc3a<

Which party were they from?

[r] INTERVIEWER: Enter ONLY FIRST mention here [n]

<1> Conservative party

<2> Liberal party

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other party (specify)[specify]

<98> Don't know [goto pesc5]

<99> Refused [goto pesc5]

====>

>pesc3b<

Any other party?

(Did any other party contact you in person or by telephone

during the campaign?)

[r] INTERVIEWER: Enter ONLY SECOND mention here [n]

<0> No [goto pesc5]

<1> Conservative party

<2> Liberal party

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other party (specify)[specify]

<98> Don't know [goto pesc5]

<99> Refused [goto pesc5]

====>

>pesc3c<

Any other party?

(Did any other party contact you in person or by telephone during

the campaign?)

[r] INTERVIEWER: Enter ONLY THIRD mention here [n]

<0> No [goto pesc5]

<1> Conservative party

<2> Liberal party

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other party (specify)[specify]

<98> Don't know [goto pesc5]

<99> Refused [goto pesc5]

====>

>pesc3d<

Any other party?

(Did any other party contact you in person or by telephone during

the campaign?)

[r] INTERVIEWER: Enter ONLY FOURTH mention here [n]

<0> No

<1> Conservative party

<2> Liberal party

<3> N.D.P.

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other party (specify)[specify]

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

====>

>pesc5<

Would you say you were VERY WELL informed, FAIRLY WELL informed,

NOT VERY WELL informed, or NOT AT ALL informed about the issues

in the campaign?

<1> Very well informed

<3> Fairly well informed

<5> Not very well informed

<7> Not at all informed

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

SECTION D: LEADER, PARTY, CANDIDATE EVALUATION

>pesd1a<

Now I want to ask you how well informed you feel about the party leaders.

First, Kim Campbell.

Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL

informed about Kim Campbell?

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd1b<

And what about Jean Chretien?

Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or

NOT AT ALL informed about Jean Chretien?

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd1c<

Audrey McLaughlin?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well,

or NOT AT ALL informed about Audrey McLaughlin?)

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd1d<

Preston Manning?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or

NOT AT ALL informed about Preston Manning?)

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd1e<

Lucien Bouchard?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or

NOT AT ALL informed about Lucien Bouchard?)

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch31<

[if pesd1a ge <7>] [# if not at all dk ref to ALL, skip leader ratings]

[if pesd1b ge <7>] [# goto party ratings]

[if pesd1c ge <7>]

[if pesd1d ge <7>]

[if pesd1e ge <7>]

[goto pesch32]

[endif][endif][endif][endif][endif]

>pesd2<

Now, I'll ask you to rate each leader on a scale that runs from 0 to 100.

Ratings between 0 and 50 mean that you rate that person

UNFAVOURABLY. Ratings between 50 and 100 mean that you rate that

person FAVOURABLY. You may use any number from 0 to 100.

Enter <c> to continue=====>

[# start randomized leader section here]

>pesch16< [if pesrn12 eq <01> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <02> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <03> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <04> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <05> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <06> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <07> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <08> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <09> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <10> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <11> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <12> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <13> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <14> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <15> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <16> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <17> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <18> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <19> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <20> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <21> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <22> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <23> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <24> goto pesd2d]

>pesd2a< [if pesd1a ge <7> goto pesch17]

KIM CAMPBELL?

(How would you rate KIM CAMPBELL?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch17< [if pesrn12 eq <01> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <02> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <03> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <04> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <05> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <06> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <07> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <08> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <09> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <10> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <11> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <12> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <13> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <14> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <15> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <16> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <17> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <18> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <19> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <20> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <21> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <22> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <23> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <24> goto pesout1]

>pesd2b< [if pesd1b ge <7> goto pesch18]

JEAN CHRETIEN?

(How would you rate JEAN CHRETIEN?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch18< [if pesrn12 eq <01> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <02> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <03> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <04> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <05> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <06> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <07> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <08> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <09> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <10> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <11> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <12> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <13> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <14> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <15> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <16> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <17> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <18> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <19> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <20> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <21> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <22> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <23> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <24> goto pesd2a]

>pesd2c< [if pesd1c ge <7> goto pesch19]

AUDREY MCLAUGHLIN?

(How would you rate AUDREY MCLAUGHLIN?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch19< [if pesrn12 eq <01> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <02> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <03> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <04> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <05> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <06> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <07> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <08> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <09> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <10> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <11> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <12> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <13> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <14> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <15> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <16> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <17> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <18> goto pesd2d]

[if pesrn12 eq <19> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <20> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <21> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <22> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <23> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <24> goto pesd2b]

>pesd2d< [if pesd1d ge <7>][goto pesd2e][endif]

PRESTON MANNING?

(How would you rate PRESTON MANNING?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesd2e< [if pesd1e ge <7>][goto pesch20][endif]

LUCIEN BOUCHARD?

(How would you rate LUCIEN BOUCHARD?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch20< [if pesrn12 eq <01> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <02> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <03> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <04> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <05> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <06> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <07> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <08> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <09> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <10> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <11> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <12> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <13> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <14> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <15> goto pesout1]

[if pesrn12 eq <16> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <17> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <18> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <19> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <20> goto pesd2a]

[if pesrn12 eq <21> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <22> goto pesd2b]

[if pesrn12 eq <23> goto pesd2c]

[if pesrn12 eq <24> goto pesd2c]

[#end randomized leader section here]

>pesout1< [goto pesch32]

[#start randomized party section here]

>pesch32<

Now, I'll ask you to rate each political party on the same scale

that runs from 0 to 100.

You may use any number from 0 to 100.

(Ratings between 0 and 50 mean that you rate that party

UNFAVOURABLY. Ratings between 50 and 100 mean that you rate that

party FAVOURABLY.)

Enter <c> to continue=====>

>pesch21< [if pesrn13 eq <01> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <02> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <03> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <04> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <05> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <06> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <07> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <08> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <09> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <10> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <11> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <12> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <13> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <14> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <15> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <16> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <17> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <18> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <19> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <20> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <21> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <22> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <23> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <24> goto pesd2j]

>pesd2g<

The FEDERAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY?

(How would you rate the FEDERAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch22< [if pesrn13 eq <01> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <02> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <03> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <04> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <05> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <06> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <07> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <08> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <09> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <10> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <11> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <12> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <13> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <14> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <15> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <16> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <17> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <18> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <19> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <20> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <21> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <22> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <23> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <24> goto pesout]

>pesd2h<

The FEDERAL LIBERAL PARTY?

(How would you rate the FEDERAL LIBERAL PARTY?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch23< [if pesrn13 eq <01> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <02> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <03> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <04> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <05> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <06> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <07> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <08> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <09> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <10> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <11> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <12> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <13> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <14> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <15> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <16> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <17> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <18> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <19> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <20> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <21> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <22> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <23> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <24> goto pesd2g]

>pesd2i<

The FEDERAL NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

(How would you rate the FEDERAL NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch24< [if pesrn13 eq <01> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <02> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <03> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <04> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <05> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <06> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <07> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <08> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <09> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <10> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <11> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <12> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <13> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <14> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <15> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <16> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <17> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <18> goto pesd2j]

[if pesrn13 eq <19> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <20> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <21> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <22> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <23> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <24> goto pesd2h]

>pesd2j< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesd2k][endif]

>pesd2ja<

The REFORM PARTY?

(How would you rate the REFORM PARTY?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch37< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesch25][endif]

>pesd2k<

The BLOC Québécois?

(How would you rate the BLOC Québécois?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch36< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesd2ja][endif]

>pesch25< [if pesrn13 eq <01> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <02> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <03> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <04> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <05> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <06> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <07> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <08> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <09> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <10> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <11> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <12> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <13> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <14> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <15> goto pesout]

[if pesrn13 eq <16> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <17> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <18> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <19> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <20> goto pesd2g]

[if pesrn13 eq <21> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <22> goto pesd2h]

[if pesrn13 eq <23> goto pesd2i]

[if pesrn13 eq <24> goto pesd2i]

>pesout< [# end randomized party section here]

>pesd4<

Now I want to ask you how well informed you feel about the

CANDIDATES in your riding.

Enter <c> to continue=====>

>pesd4a<

First, the Conservative candidate.

Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT

ALL informed about the Conservative candidate?

<0> No candidate

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd4b<

The Liberal candidate?

Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT

ALL informed about the Liberal candidate?

<0> No candidate

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd4c<

The NDP candidate?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT

ALL informed about the NDP candidate?)

<0> No candidate

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesd4d< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesd4e][endif]

The Reform Party candidate?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT

ALL informed about the Reform Party candidate?)

<0> No candidate

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====> [goto pesch43]

>pesd4e<

The Bloc Québécois candidate?

(Do you feel VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or

NOT AT ALL informed about The Bloc Québécois candidate?)

<0> No candidate

<1> Very Well

<3> Fairly Well

<5> Not Very Well

<7> Not At all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch43<

[if pesprov eq <4>]

[if pesd4a ge <7>] [# if not at all dk ref to ALL, skip candidate ratings]

[if pesd4b ge <7>] [# goto provincial premier rating]

[if pesd4c ge <7>]

[if pesd4e ge <7>]

[goto pesch44]

[endif][endif][endif][endif][endif]

[if pesprov ne <4>]

[if pesd4a ge <7>] [# if not at all dk ref to ALL, skip candidate ratings]

[if pesd4b ge <7>] [# goto provincial premier rating]

[if pesd4c ge <7>]

[if pesd4d ge <7>]

[goto pesch44]

[endif][endif][endif][endif][endif]

[if pesd4a eq <0>] [# no party has candidates, skip candidate ratings]

[if pesd4b eq <0>] [# goto provincial premier rating]

[if pesd4c eq <0>]

[if pesd4d eq <0>]

[if pesd4e eq <0>]

[goto pesch44]

[endif][endif][endif][endif][endif]

>pesch33<

Please rate each candidate in your riding on the same scale that

runs from 0 to 100.

You may use any number from 0 to 100.

(Ratings between 0 and 50 mean that you rate that candidate

UNFAVOURABLY. Ratings between 50 and 100 mean that you rate that

candidate FAVOURABLY.)

Enter <c> to continue=====>

[# start candidate randomization here ]

>pesch38< [if pesrn18 eq <01> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <02> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <03> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <04> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <05> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <06> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <07> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <08> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <09> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <10> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <11> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <12> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <13> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <14> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <15> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <16> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <17> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <18> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <19> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <20> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <21> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <22> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <23> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <24> goto pesd5d]

>pesd5a< [if pesd4a ge <7> goto pesch39]

[if pesd4a eq <0> goto pesch39]

The CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE?

(How would you rate the CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch39< [if pesrn18 eq <01> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <02> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <03> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <04> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <05> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <06> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <07> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <08> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <09> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <10> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <11> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <12> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <13> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <14> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <15> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <16> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <17> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <18> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <19> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <20> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <21> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <22> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <23> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <24> goto pesout3]

>pesd5b< [if pesd4b ge <7> goto pesch40]

[if pesd4b eq <0> goto pesch40]

The LIBERAL CANDIDATE?

(How would you rate the LIBERAL CANDIDATE?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch40< [if pesrn18 eq <01> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <02> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <03> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <04> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <05> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <06> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <07> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <08> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <09> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <10> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <11> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <12> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <13> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <14> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <15> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <16> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <17> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <18> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <19> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <20> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <21> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <22> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <23> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <24> goto pesd5a]

>pesd5c< [if pesd4c ge <7> goto pesch41]

[if pesd4c eq <0> goto pesch41]

The NDP CANDIDATE?

(How would you rate the NDP CANDIDATE?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch41< [if pesrn18 eq <01> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <02> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <03> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <04> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <05> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <06> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <07> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <08> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <09> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <10> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <11> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <12> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <13> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <14> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <15> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <16> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <17> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <18> goto pesd5d]

[if pesrn18 eq <19> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <20> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <21> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <22> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <23> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <24> goto pesd5b]

>pesd5d< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesd5e][endif]

[if pesd4d ge <7> goto pesch42]

[if pesd4d eq <0> goto pesch42]

The REFORM CANDIDATE?

(How would you rate the REFORM CANDIDATE?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>[goto ch42]

>pesd5e< [if pesd4e ge <7> goto pesch42]

[if pesd4e eq <0> goto pesch42]

The BLOC Québécois CANDIDATE?

(How would you rate THE BLOC Québécois CANDIDATE?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesch42< [if pesrn18 eq <01> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <02> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <03> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <04> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <05> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <06> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <07> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <08> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <09> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <10> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <11> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <12> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <13> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <14> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <15> goto pesout3]

[if pesrn18 eq <16> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <17> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <18> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <19> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <20> goto pesd5a]

[if pesrn18 eq <21> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <22> goto pesd5b]

[if pesrn18 eq <23> goto pesd5c]

[if pesrn18 eq <24> goto pesd5c]

>pesout3< [goto pesd5f] [#end randomized candidate section here]

>pesch44<

Please rate the following people on the same scale that runs from 0 to 100.

You may use any number from 0 to 100.

(Ratings between 0 and 50 mean that you rate that person

UNFAVOURABLY. Ratings between 50 and 100 mean that you rate that

person FAVOURABLY.)

Enter <c> to continue=====>

>pesd5f<

[if pesprov eq <0>][store <CLYDE WELLS> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <1>][store <CATHERINE CALLBECK> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <2>][store <JOHN SAVAGE> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <3>][store <FRANK MCKENNA> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <4>][store <ROBERT BOURASSA> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <5>][store <BOB RAE> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <6>][store <GARY FILMON> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <7>][store <ROY ROMANOW> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <8>][store <RALPH KLEIN> in rc4][endif]

[if pesprov eq <9>][store <MIKE HARCOURT> in rc4][endif]

How would you rate [fill rc4]

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesd5g<

How would you rate PIERRE TRUDEAU?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesd3h<

How would you rate JEAN CHAREST?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very unfavourable and

100 means very favourable?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

SECTION E: POLICY

>pese1a< [# rc3 used in french to provide translated fill]

In general, has the federal government given MORE, ABOUT THE SAME,

or LESS attention to [fill pppp] than to other provinces?

<1> More attention

<3> About the same attention

<5> Less attention

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pese2b< [if pesprov ne <4>][goto pese4a][endif]

What is your opinion on Quebec sovereignty, that is, Quebec

is no longer a part of Canada?

Are you very favourable, somewhat favourable, somewhat

opposed, or very opposed.

<1> Very favourable

<3> Somewhat favourable

<5> Somewhat opposed

<7> Very opposed

<0> Neither favourable or opposed

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

[# RANDOMIZATION]

>pese4a< [if pesrn2 eq <2>][goto pese4b][endif]

As a general rule, the government should:

One: Reduce unemployment even if it means the deficit stays high

OR

Two: Reduce the deficit even if it means unemployment stays high

[r] INTERVIEWER: If respondent is hesitant say "Well if you had to [n]

[r] choose which is CLOSER to your own view?" [n]

<1> Reduce unemployment

<2> Reduce the deficit

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>[goto pese5a]

>pese4b<

As a general rule, the government should:

One: Reduce the deficit even if it means unemployment stays high

OR

Two: Reduce unemployment even if it means the deficit stays high

[r] INTERVIEWER: If respondent is hesitant say "Well if you had to [n]

[r] choose which is CLOSER to your own view?" [n]

<1> Reduce the deficit

<2> Reduce unemployment

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

[# RANDOMIZATION]

>pese5a< [if pesrn3 eq <2>][goto pese5b][endif]

Which comes closer to your own view:

One: We can only be sure the needs of ALL elderly people are met if the government gives pensions to all.

OR

Two: The government should not provide pensions to elderly people with

above average incomes.

[r] INTERVIEWER: The average household income is 43 thousand dollars [n]

[r] IF ASKED: We mean old age security, not Canada Pension [n]

<1> Give pensions to all

<2> No pensions for those above average income

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>[goto pese8]

>pese5b<

Which comes closer to your own view:

One: The government should NOT provide pensions to elderly

people with above average incomes.

OR

Two: We can only be sure the needs of ALL elderly people are met

if the government gives pensions to all.

[r] INTERVIEWER: The average household income is 43 thousand dollars [n]

[r] IF ASKED: We mean old age security, not Canada Pension [n]

<1> No pensions for those above average income

<2> Give pensions to all

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese8<

Could you tell me if you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE,

SOMEWHAT DISAGREE, or STRONGLY DISAGREE with the following

statements:

The ONLY way to create jobs is to ELIMINATE the deficit.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese9<

To maintain our social programmes, we must ELIMINATE the deficit.

Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE?

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese12<

NDP provincial governments prove that the NDP can't be trusted to govern.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese13<

Any government that accepts a high level of unemployment deserves to

be defeated.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese15<

The government should leave it ENTIRELY to the private sector to

create jobs.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese15b<

We must crack down on crime, even if that means people lose their

rights.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese16< [if pesprov ne <4>][goto pese17a][endif]

Jean Chretien betrayed Quebec in the constitutional negotiations.

(Do you STRONGLY AGREE, SOMEWHAT AGREE, SOMEWHAT

DISAGREE or STRONGLY DISAGREE)

<1> Strongly agree

<3> Somewhat agree

<5> Somewhat disagree

<7> Strongly disagree

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pese17a<

Do you happen to know which party promised to DO AWAY with the

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) ?

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY FIRST MENTION HERE [n]

<0> None [goto pese18a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<97> All parties [goto pese18a]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese18a]

<99> Refused [goto pese18a]

====>

>pese17b<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY SECOND MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese18a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese18a]

<99> Refused [goto pese18a]

====>

>pese17c<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY THIRD MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese18a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese18a]

<99> Refused [goto pese18a]

====>

>pese17d<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY FOURTH MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

====>

>pese18a<

Do you happen to know which party promised to ELIMINATE the deficit

in THREE years?

<0> None [goto pese19a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<97> All parties [goto pese19a]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese19a]

<99> Refused [goto pese19a]

====>

>e18b<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY SECOND MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese19a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese19a]

<99> Refused [goto pese19a]

====>

>pese18c<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY THIRD MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese19a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese19a]

<99> Refused [goto pese19a]

====>

>pese18d<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY FOURTH MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

====>

>pese19a<

And do you happen to know which party promised to ELIMINATE the

deficit in FIVE years?

<0> None [goto pese20a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<97> All parties [goto pese20a]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese20a]

<99> Refused [goto pese20a]

====>

>pese19b<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY SECOND MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese20a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese20a] <99> Refused [goto pese20a]

====>

>pese19c<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY THIRD MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pese20a]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pese20a]

<99> Refused [goto pese20a]

====>

>pese19d<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY FOURTH MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know <99> Refused

====>

>pese20a<

Do you happen to know which party promised to increase spending on

public works?

<0> None [goto pesF]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<97> All parties [goto pesF]

<98> Don't Know [goto pesF]

<99> Refused [goto pesF]

====>

>pese20b<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY SECOND MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pesF]

<1> Conservative / Kim Campbell

<2> Liberal / Jean Chretien

<3> N.D.P / Audrey McLaughlin

<4> Reform Party / Preston Manning

<5> Bloc Québécois / Lucien Bouchard

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pesF]

<99> Refused [goto pesF]

====>

>pese20c< [allow 2]

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY THIRD MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION [goto pesF]

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know [goto pesF]

<99> Refused [goto pesF]

====>

>pese20d<

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER ONLY FOURTH MENTION HERE. [n]

[r] DO NOT PROMPT [n]

<0> NO FURTHER MENTION

<1> Conservative

<2> Liberal

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform Party

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other (specify) [specify]

<98> Don't Know

<99> Refused

====>

SECTION F: COLLECTIVITIES

>pesF<

Using the 0 to 100 scale again, where 0 means very negative

and 100 means very positive, I would like you to tell me how you

feel about the following groups and places.

You may use any number from 0 to 100.

Enter <c> to continue=====>

>pesf1<

How do you feel about CANADA?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesf2<

How do you feel about QUEBEC?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesf4<

How do you feel about the UNITED STATES?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesf6<

RACIAL MINORITIES?

(How do you feel about racial minorities?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesf7<

ABORIGINAL PEOPLES?

(How do you feel about Aboriginal Peoples?)

[r] INTERVIEWER: if required, Aboriginal People are Indians, [n]

[r] Inuit (Eskimo) and Metis [n]

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

SECTION G: LEADER TRAITS

[# start randomized leader characteristics section here]

[#skips on pesd1]

>pesch5<

[if pesd1a ge <7>] [# if not at all dk ref to ALL, skip leader traits]

[if pesd1b ge <7>] [# goto interest groups]

[if pesd1c ge <7>]

[if pesd1d ge <7>]

[if pesd1e ge <7>]

[goto pesH]

[endif][endif][endif][endif][endif]

>pesG<

Next, please tell me how well the following words fit each leader.

Type <c> to continue =====>

>pesch26< [if pesrn14 eq <01> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <02> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <03> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <04> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <05> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <06> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <07> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <08> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <09> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <10> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <11> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <12> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <13> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <14> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <15> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <16> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <17> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <18> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <19> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <20> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <21> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <22> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <23> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <24> goto pesg4a]

>pesg1a< [if pesd1a ge <7> goto pesch27]

(Now what about..)

KIM CAMPBELL.

Does "ARROGANT" describe Kim Campbell: VERY well, FAIRLY well,

NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg1b<

"TRUSTWORTHY?"

(Does "TRUSTWORTHY" describe Kim Campbell: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg1c<

"PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP?"

(Does "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" describe Kim Campbell:

VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg1d<

"AGGRESSIVE"

(Does "AGGRESSIVE" describe Kim Campbell: VERY well, FAIRLY well,

NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch27< [if pesrn14 eq <01> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <02> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <03> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <04> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <05> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <06> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <07> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <08> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <09> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <10> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <11> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <12> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <13> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <14> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <15> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <16> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <17> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <18> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <19> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <20> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <21> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <22> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <23> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <24> goto pesout2]

>pesg2a< [if pesd1b ge <7>][goto pesch28][endif]

(Now what about..)

JEAN CHRETIEN.

Does "ARROGANT" describe Jean Chretien: VERY well, FAIRLY well,

NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg2b<

"TRUSTWORTHY?"

(Does "TRUSTWORTHY" describe Jean Chretien: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg2c<

"PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP?"

(Does "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" describe Jean Chretien:

VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg2d<

"AGGRESSIVE"

(Does "AGGRESSIVE" describe JEAN CHRETIEN: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch28< [if pesrn14 eq <01> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <02> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <03> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <04> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <05> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <06> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <07> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <08> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <09> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <10> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <11> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <12> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <13> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <14> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <15> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <16> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <17> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <18> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <19> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <20> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <21> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <22> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <23> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <24> goto pesg1a]

>pesg3a< [if pesd1c ge <7>][goto pesch29][endif]

(Now what about..)

AUDREY MCLAUGHLIN.

Does "ARROGANT" describe Audrey McLaughlin: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg3b<

"TRUSTWORTHY?"

(Does "TRUSTWORTHY" describe Audrey McLaughlin: VERY

WELL, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg3c<

"PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP?"

(Does "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" describe Audrey

McLaughlin: VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well,

or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg3d<

"AGGRESSIVE"

(Does "AGGRESSIVE" describe AUDREY MCLAUGHLIN: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch29< [if pesrn14 eq <01> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <02> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <03> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <04> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <05> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <06> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <07> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <08> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <09> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <10> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <11> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <12> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <13> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <14> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <15> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <16> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <17> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <18> goto pesg4a]

[if pesrn14 eq <19> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <20> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <21> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <22> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <23> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <24> goto pesg2a]

>pesg4a< [if pesprov eq <4>][goto pesg5a][endif]

[if pesd1d ge <7>][goto pesch30][endif]

(Now what about..)

PRESTON MANNING.

Does "ARROGANT" describe Preston Manning: VERY well,FAIRLY well,

NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg4b<

"TRUSTWORTHY?"

(Does "TRUSTWORTHY" describe Preston Manning: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg4c<

"PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP?"

(Does "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" describe Preston Manning:

VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg4d<

"AGGRESSIVE"

(Does "AGGRESSIVE" describe PRESTON MANNING: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg5a< [if pesprov ne <4>][goto pesch30][endif]

[if pesd1e ge <7>][goto pesch30][endif]

(Now what about..)

LUCIEN BOUCHARD.

Does "ARROGANT" describe Lucien Bouchard: VERY well, FAIRLY well,

NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg5b<

"TRUSTWORTHY?"

(Does "TRUSTWORTHY" describe Lucien Bouchard: VERY well,

FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg5c<

"PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP?"

(Does "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" describe Lucien Bouchard:

VERY well, FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesg5d<

"AGGRESSIVE"

(Does "AGGRESSIVE" describe LUCIEN BOUCHARD: VERY

well,FAIRLY well, NOT VERY well, or NOT AT ALL?)

<1> very well

<3> fairly well

<5> not very well

<7> not at all

<8> Don't Know <9> Refused

====>

>pesch30< [if pesrn14 eq <01> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <02> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <03> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <04> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <05> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <06> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <07> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <08> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <09> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <10> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <11> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <12> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <13> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <14> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <15> goto pesout2]

[if pesrn14 eq <16> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <17> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <18> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <19> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <20> goto pesg1a]

[if pesrn14 eq <21> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <22> goto pesg2a]

[if pesrn14 eq <23> goto pesg3a]

[if pesrn14 eq <24> goto pesg3a]

>pesout2< [# end randomized characteristics section here]

SECTION H: INTEREST GROUPS

>pesH<

Using the 0 to 100 scale again, please tell me how you

feel about each of the following groups.

You may use any number from 0 to 100.

Enter <c> to continue=====>

>pesh1<

How do you feel about FARMERS?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh2<

How do you feel about PEOPLE ON WELFARE?

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh3<

SMALL BUSINESS?

(How do you feel about small business?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh4<

LABOUR UNIONS?

(How do you feel about labour unions?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh5<

OLD PEOPLE?

(How do you feel about old people?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh6<

BIG BUSINESS?

(How do you feel about big business?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh7<

FEMINISTS?

(How do you feel about feminists?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh8<

THE POLICE?

(How do you feel about the police?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh9<

HOMOSEXUALS?

(How do you feel about homosexuals?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

>pesh10<

ANTI-ABORTION GROUPS?

(How do you feel about anti-abortion groups?)

(The scale runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means very negative and

100 means very positive?)

[r] INTERVIEWER: IF ASKED, anti means against and you [n]

[r] can CONFIRM that pro-life is anti-abortion BUT [n]

[r] never volunteer pro-life [n]

<0-100>

<998> Don't Know <999> Refused

====>

SECTION L: PARTY IDENTIFICATION

>pesch54<

[r] INTERVIEWER: The next question is a response time item. [n]

[r] You will be asked to read the question, then enter [n]

[r] c as you finish reading the last word of the question. [n]

[r] [n]

[r] When the respondent gives you a substantive response, [n]

[r] enter c again. [n]

[r] [n]

[r] After entering the second c the response categories [n]

[r] will be displayed. [n]

<c> To continue

====>

>pesl1<

[store <Reform> in rc3]

[if pesprov eq <4>][store <Bloc Québécois> in rc3][endif]

Thinking of federal politics, do you usually think of yourself as

a Liberal, Conservative, N.D.P, [fill rc3] or none of these?

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER <c> AS YOU FINISH READING THE [n]

[r] LAST WORD OF THE QUESTION! [n]

====>

>pesch55< [start timer][no erase]

[r] INTERVIEWER: ENTER <c> WHEN RESPONDENT BEGINS [n]

[r] TO ANSWER [n]

=====>

>pesch56< [stop timer][record timer in pesJF2][no erase]

<1> Liberal

<2> Conservative

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<5> Bloc Québécois

<6> Other [specify](specify) [goto pesl5]

<97> None of these [goto pesl3]

<98> Don't Know [goto pesl3]

<99> Refused [goto pesl5]

====>

>pesl2<

[if pesch56 eq <1>][store <Liberal> in rc3][endif]

[if pesch56 eq <2>][store <Conservative> in rc3][endif]

[if pesch56 eq <3>][store <NDP> in rc3][endif]

[if pesch56 eq <4>][store <Reform> in rc3][endif]

[if pesch56 eq <5>][store <Bloc Québécois> in rc3][endif]

How strongly [fill rc3] do you feel,

very strongly, fairly strongly, or not very strongly?

<1> Very Strongly

<3> Fairly Strongly

<5> Not Very Strongly

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>[goto pesl5]

>pesl3<

Do you generally think of yourself as being a little closer

to one of the federal parties than to the others?

<1> Yes [goto pesl4]

<5> No

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>[goto pesl5]

>pesl4<

Which party is that?

<1> Liberal

<2> Conservative

<3> N.D.P

<4> Reform

<6> Other

<7> None

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pesl5<

On the whole, are you VERY SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED,

NOT VERY SATISFIED or NOT SATISFIED AT ALL with the way

democracy works in Canada?

<1> Very satisfied

<3> Fairly satisfied

<5> Not very satisfied

<7> Not satisfied at all

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

====>

>pesage<

Please tell me in what year were you born?

<1875-1975> Enter year of birth please

<9997> other

<9998> Don't know <9999> Refused

====>

>pesend1<

Would you say these questions have been VERY interesting,

SOMEWHAT interesting or NOT VERY interesting?

<1> VERY interesting

<3> SOMEWHAT interesting

<5> NOT VERY interesting

<8> Don't know <9> Refused

=====>

>pesend2<

And how many minutes do you think it took to complete this questionnaire?

<1-97> Record number of minutes

<98> Don't know <99> Refused

=====>

=======================================

GENDER VERIFICATION

1) Confirms initial entry of gender

2) Forces re-entry if conflict

3) Forces explicit question if twice don't know

4) records elapsed time on explicit question

=======================================

>pesgen2<

[r] INTERVIEWER: Please Enter Respondent's GENDER again. [n]

<1> Male

<5> Female

<8> Not Sure

====>

>pesch80< [if pesgend eq <8>][#and][if pesgen2 eq <8>]

[goto pesgen4]

[endif][endif]

[if pesgen2 eq pesgend][goto pesend][endif]

[if pesgend eq <8>][#and][if pesgen2 ne <8>]

[store pesgen2 in pesgend]

[goto pesend]

[endif][endif]

>pesgen3< [store <> in rc3]

[store <> in rc4]

[if pesgend eq <1>][#and][if pesgen2 eq <5>]

[store <MALE> in rc3]

[store <FEMALE> in rc4]

[endif][endif]

[if pesgend eq <5>][#and][if pesgen2 eq <1>]

[store <FEMALE> in rc3]

[store <MALE> in rc4]

[endif][endif]

[if pesgend eq <1>][#and][if pesgen2 eq <8>]

[store <MALE> in rc3]

[store <DON'T KNOW> in rc4]

[endif][endif]

[if pesgend eq <5>][#and][if pesgen2 eq <8>]

[store <FEMALE> in rc3]

[store <DON'T KNOW> in rc4]

[endif][endif]

[r] [blink] WHOOPS! [n][r] INTERVIEWER: At the beginning of [n]

[r] the interview you said the respondent was a [fill rc3], and [n]

[r] NOW you have indicated the respondent is [fill rc4]!!! [n]

[r] Please enter the respondent's gender again! [n]

<1> Male

<5> Female

====> [goto pesend]

>pesgen4< [start timer]

I'm sorry I'm having problems with my headset, could

you please tell me are you male or female?

<1> Male

<5> Female

<9> Refused

====>

>pesend< [if pesgen3 ne <>][store pesgen3 in pesgend][endif]

[if pesgen4 ne <>][store pesgen4 in pesgend][endif]

[if pestm5 eq <>][settime pestm5][endif]

END OF POST ELECTION SURVEY